|
|
Rank: Commander
Joined: 5/7/2007
Posts: 426
Location: cowiche
|
congrates on your mount .i would be interested in seeing a picture of it. i myself agree with the 50" limit. there will be more bigger fish in the future with this size limit. nobody likes to be the bad guy when people are having a great day of fishing but there is now at least two fish that would never have reached 36" and now 50" more signs on these lakes about the muskie laws with the fine to be incured are needed along with a dial to the law inforcement when people willfully ignore the law. these same people will keep on keeping illegal fish because they were able to get away with it, i myself would like to put a muskie on the wall but it certainly will be that much harder with the undersized fish being kept.
|
|
Rank: Admiral
Joined: 10/22/2007
Posts: 2,022
Location: Puyallup
|
Ty wrote:50" is excessive. Its not the educated fishermen that ruin our fisheries. Its the people that don't know any better. Twice last year at Newman I saw people with tigers. One guy and his wife were trout trolling and caught a nice 30-32 incher. They kept it saying its the biggest fish they had caught in freshwater. They thought it was some kind of pike. I told them what it was and that it was actually not a legal fish to keep do to the size. The woman got pissed and the guy looked baffled. I told them it was a nice fish and just be careful not to get caught with it. They were heading for the launch last I saw them.
The other ones I saw were kids, maybe 15-17 or so years old. Three of them in a beat up Jon boat with an electric motor on the back. They were around the submerged island and I was heading for that area looking for smallies. There was a huge commotion in the boat. One of them had a nice fish. Turned out to be a small tiger, looked about 24-26 inches. They were excited and whoopin and hollerin. I came over and congratulated them on their huge fish and mentioned it was to small to keep and that they had to be 36". They got pretty defiant and I felt like a tool for ruining their "trophy". They scooted on their way but kept their fish.
These are the people ruining the fishery. Not the ones that actually fish for the tigers and know the regulations. I think that a 50inch limit is excessive. Maybe a 42-44 inch limit at the most but a 36 inch limit was just fine considering the small numbers of tigers and the rarity they are caught. Silver lake in spokane county wont even have 50 inch fish for another year or 3. Newman is incredibly hard to locate them in even though its perfect habitat.
Raising the limit to 50 inches would have denied me my 42 inch wall hanger I get back from Gary Blew's taxidermy at the end of this month. Its the biggest fish Ive ever caught and not from lack of trying. Ive been trying to catch tigers in newman for 4 years about and ive only hooked a couple and landed one. You can tell me about replicas all you want. But a replica is a taxidermists embellished reproduction of a picture and an exaggerated story told by the fisherman. Its fake. Its nothing but foam and paint. Gary Blew skinned my fish in front of me and filleted it out, giving me the meat right there.
90% of my fishing is C&R however. I keep the occasional 6lb+ bass and most of the legal keepers if Im having a good day. I like the taste of the fish and it tastes that much better if I caught it myself. Maybe find a new taxidermist. Take a photo and measure your fish,not very complicated. The only embellished and exaggerated story will be the one you tell.
Fun with Dwight http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gLeI-V9h6EY&feature=relatedYou like muskie fishing? http://www.muskylink.com/ How about bass? http://bigbasslink.ning.com/
|
|
Rank: Commander
Joined: 4/30/2007
Posts: 352
Location: tacoma
|
You really can't go wrong with a replica mount. Plus the fish gets to go free to fight and give a thrill to someone else. Remember Ty, these Tigers do not reproduce so if you take em' obviously they won't get replaced. I respect your right to keep the TROPHY.But now if you get a 50 will ya take that one too because you can? Or since you've got your TROPHY are you good?
Remember "They got pretty defiant and I felt like a tool for ruining their "trophy". They scooted on their way but kept their fish." as a outdoors man you kinda have the obligation to report those guys. "These are the people ruining the fishery" as you stated..You should have reported them.
The 6 lb bass...that was a good "Gene Line " taken from that lake to eat? To his is own I guess...See Yah!
|
|
Rank: Member
Joined: 5/28/2007
Posts: 12
Location: Spokane Valley
|
I won't keep another tiger unless its a state record. The mount I had done cost plenty as it was.
You can look up some of Gary Blew's work. He won his share of competitions, no need for me to get a foam carver as a replacement.
Keep in mind we are all entitled to our opinions, no matter how they disagree with others. I'll post a pic of my mount as soon as I get it.
|
|
Rank: Admiral
Joined: 10/22/2007
Posts: 2,022
Location: Puyallup
|
Ty wrote:I won't keep another tiger unless its a state record. The mount I had done cost plenty as it was.
You can look up some of Gary Blew's work. He won his share of competitions, no need for me to get a foam carver as a replacement.
Keep in mind we are all entitled to our opinions, no matter how they disagree with others. I'll post a pic of my mount as soon as I get it. Of coarse your entitled to your opinion. But bare in mind we only have 7 lakes containing Tiger Muskies. It is my opinion that this is a sensative fishery. Every muskie pulled out is one less in these waters. I would only ask you to reconsider your approach to tiger muskies. Take care.
Fun with Dwight http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gLeI-V9h6EY&feature=relatedYou like muskie fishing? http://www.muskylink.com/ How about bass? http://bigbasslink.ning.com/
|
|
Rank: Commander
Joined: 5/4/2007
Posts: 387
Location: Shoreline
|
Muskie Inc.'s official policy is to encourage catch and release AND not criticize anyone for keeping a legal musky. I mounted my first legal, a 34-incher from Minnesota, and looking at the mount still helps me get through long winters. I have absolutely no problem with Ty mounting his trophy. I'm sure that Ty, after catching more of those lovely 42 to 44 inchers, won't think twice about releasing them because like the rest of us he'll want them to grow up to be 30-pounders!
It's pointless to re-argue the 50-inch rule. It's impossible to write a law or regulation that makes everyone happy. There will always be disagreement over things like this, no matter how much we argue over it. I believe most people are honest and want to follow the rules. That's where education comes in.
Wisconsin's experience is instructive. That state has a 34-inch minimum, yet 99% of the muskies caught there are released. That's what I want to see happen here. We won't get there by getting confrontational with people. It's human nature to get defensive, and rarely if ever is that approach productive. Implementing this regulation will consist of 99% education and 1% enforcement. Don't try to be an amateur game warden. Leave law enforcement to those paid to do it; the public education portion is our job.
If you decide to report a fishing or hunting violation, don't tell the violator you're reporting him, be low-key about getting vehicle license or boat registration numbers, write down a description of the violator and all other relevant particulars (i.e., don't trust memory), and be willing to appear in court as a witness if asked or the warden won't be able to do anything.
|
|
Rank: Warrant Officer
Joined: 5/1/2007
Posts: 174
Location: Kent
|
Well put, Don.
"While it is Muskies Inc. policy to encourage the careful release of healthy Muskies,
that are not personal trophies to the angler,
it is not our policy to intimidate or pressure any angler or group of anglers into releasing Muskies.
We lead by example."
It's read at every Chapter meeting for a reason.
Heck no it is not easy at times.
But I want mine to be a program of attraction, not promotion.
I can do a lot with encouragement and education.
Lead by example.
|
|
Rank: Commander
Joined: 4/30/2007
Posts: 352
Location: tacoma
|
REMEMBER.........50 INCH LIMIT!!!! Not 24 ,not 36, not 19, not 48 get the picture?And anything close to 53 get a picture!!........Just a reminder since the signs are not up and the new regs aren't printed yet...See yah
|
|
Rank: Warrant Officer
Joined: 4/30/2007
Posts: 170
Location: Buckley
|
Take it easy Muskyhunter. Stress is not good for us.
Rosann
Ever have a Tiger by the tail? I have!
Aspire to inspire before you expire.
|
|
Rank: Admiral
Joined: 10/22/2007
Posts: 2,022
Location: Puyallup
|
I still have the flyer. I havn't been up that way since Sunday. I will try to get into N.Tapps either later today or tomorrow. Kevin
Fun with Dwight http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gLeI-V9h6EY&feature=relatedYou like muskie fishing? http://www.muskylink.com/ How about bass? http://bigbasslink.ning.com/
|
|
Rank: Angler
Joined: 4/25/2008
Posts: 4
Location: Spokane
|
For someone that has been obsessed with hunting the elusive tiger muskie for a couple of years and never caught one this is great news. Hopefully word will get out and more of these beauties will be allowed to get to this size. I've had a line in the water at Newman Lake for the last 3 years and have yet to get a muskie- although just about everyone I've taken over the years has had the opp. Never kept one though. Thanks for the info and also on the education of the horizontal hold (should I ever catch one- haha!)
|
|
Rank: Admiral
Joined: 10/22/2007
Posts: 2,022
Location: Puyallup
|
pikenmuskiegirl wrote:For someone that has been obsessed with hunting the elusive tiger muskie for a couple of years and never caught one this is great news. Hopefully word will get out and more of these beauties will be allowed to get to this size. I've had a line in the water at Newman Lake for the last 3 years and have yet to get a muskie- although just about everyone I've taken over the years has had the opp. Never kept one though. Thanks for the info and also on the education of the horizontal hold (should I ever catch one- haha!) Check out the website http://www.nwtigermuskies.com/index.htmlFeel free to post any questions you have here in the forums. Don't worry about getting skunked,just look at it as your overdue for something bigger. 
Fun with Dwight http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gLeI-V9h6EY&feature=relatedYou like muskie fishing? http://www.muskylink.com/ How about bass? http://bigbasslink.ning.com/
|
|
Rank: Rear Admiral *
Joined: 4/29/2007
Posts: 179
Location: Area 9
|
pikenmuskiegirl wrote:For someone that has been obsessed with hunting the elusive tiger muskie for a couple of years and never caught one this is great news. Hopefully word will get out and more of these beauties will be allowed to get to this size. I've had a line in the water at Newman Lake for the last 3 years and have yet to get a muskie- although just about everyone I've taken over the years has had the opp. Never kept one though. Thanks for the info and also on the education of the horizontal hold (should I ever catch one- haha!) Welcome to the site. You've came to the right place to get your Muskie questions answered. The Musky guys on this site are real passionate about the sport and are great guys/gals. I think you'll find the same. I'm sure their are some people here with some knowledge on Newman and can help you out so you can get that first hook up. You have some great passion/motivation to keep working for many years with now strikes to show. I salute you for that. Stick around. You'll like it here. You'll learn a lot and can probably snag an open seat and get some field experience
Salmon......
|
|
Rank: Commander
Joined: 4/30/2007
Posts: 352
Location: tacoma
|
Heyyah kids,
Not wantin to beat a subject into the ground but.....The 50 inch minimum for tigers...This goes for all 7 of the lakes in this great state of Washington.The 7 lakes are as follow:Evergreen Reservoir,Mayfield,Merwin Reservoir, Silver (spokane),Newman and Lake Tapps.
I've been reading alot..alot of the fishing reports. Some folks do not know that the rule has changed but it has..It is a revision of the 36 inch limit that no longer exists..the rule is in the regulations and folks needs read,acknowledge and follow these new rules. I know the rule change is pretty drastic but it was done for good reasons.
So please ladies and gentleman, respect the rule change. And follow it. If a sportsman went out and started hunting Elk for instance, that person should read the rules that apply to this beast and would be expected to know the rules when hunting it. Same goes for the Tigers please, if you fish them do your homework.Check the regs, Know the regs and follow the regs...thanks
|
|
Rank: Admiral
Joined: 10/22/2007
Posts: 2,022
Location: Puyallup
|
muskyhunter wrote:Heyyah kids,
Not wantin to beat a subject into the ground but.....The 50 inch minimum for tigers...This goes for all 7 of the lakes in this great state of Washington.The 7 lakes are as follow:Evergreen Reservoir,Mayfield,Merwin Reservoir, Silver (spokane),Newman and Lake Tapps.
I've been reading alot..alot of the fishing reports. Some folks do not know that the rule has changed but it has..It is a revision of the 36 inch limit that no longer exists..the rule is in the regulations and folks needs read,acknowledge and follow these new rules. I know the rule change is pretty drastic but it was done for good reasons.
So please ladies and gentleman, respect the rule change. And follow it. If a sportsman went out and started hunting Elk for instance, that person should read the rules that apply to this beast and would be expected to know the rules when hunting it. Same goes for the Tigers please, if you fish them do your homework.Check the regs, Know the regs and follow the regs...thanks
Thought I'd just randomly click on this thread  Great reminder too
Fun with Dwight http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gLeI-V9h6EY&feature=relatedYou like muskie fishing? http://www.muskylink.com/ How about bass? http://bigbasslink.ning.com/
|
|
Rank: Commander
Joined: 3/24/2008
Posts: 310
Location: snohomish county,2nd room on the left-lower bunk
|
kevinb wrote:muskyhunter wrote:Heyyah kids,
Not wantin to beat a subject into the ground but.....The 50 inch minimum for tigers...This goes for all 7 of the lakes in this great state of Washington.The 7 lakes are as follow:Evergreen Reservoir,Mayfield,Merwin Reservoir, Silver (spokane),Newman and Lake Tapps.
I've been reading alot..alot of the fishing reports. Some folks do not know that the rule has changed but it has..It is a revision of the 36 inch limit that no longer exists..the rule is in the regulations and folks needs read,acknowledge and follow these new rules. I know the rule change is pretty drastic but it was done for good reasons.
So please ladies and gentleman, respect the rule change. And follow it. If a sportsman went out and started hunting Elk for instance, that person should read the rules that apply to this beast and would be expected to know the rules when hunting it. Same goes for the Tigers please, if you fish them do your homework.Check the regs, Know the regs and follow the regs...thanks
Thought I'd just randomly click on this thread Great reminder too Didn't they stock some in Green Lake in Seattle?
"Fishing is much more than the fish. It is the great occasion when we may return to the fine simplicity of our forefathers" Author unknown. 
|
|
Rank: Admiral
Joined: 10/22/2007
Posts: 2,022
Location: Puyallup
|
fishing collector wrote:kevinb wrote:muskyhunter wrote:Heyyah kids,
Not wantin to beat a subject into the ground but.....The 50 inch minimum for tigers...This goes for all 7 of the lakes in this great state of Washington.The 7 lakes are as follow:Evergreen Reservoir,Mayfield,Merwin Reservoir, Silver (spokane),Newman and Lake Tapps.
I've been reading alot..alot of the fishing reports. Some folks do not know that the rule has changed but it has..It is a revision of the 36 inch limit that no longer exists..the rule is in the regulations and folks needs read,acknowledge and follow these new rules. I know the rule change is pretty drastic but it was done for good reasons.
So please ladies and gentleman, respect the rule change. And follow it. If a sportsman went out and started hunting Elk for instance, that person should read the rules that apply to this beast and would be expected to know the rules when hunting it. Same goes for the Tigers please, if you fish them do your homework.Check the regs, Know the regs and follow the regs...thanks
Thought I'd just randomly click on this thread Great reminder too Didn't they stock some in Green Lake in Seattle? I wish...but no
Fun with Dwight http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gLeI-V9h6EY&feature=relatedYou like muskie fishing? http://www.muskylink.com/ How about bass? http://bigbasslink.ning.com/
|
|
Rank: Warrant Officer
Joined: 5/7/2007
Posts: 177
Location: South King
|
kevinb wrote:fishing collector wrote:kevinb wrote:muskyhunter wrote:Heyyah kids,
Not wantin to beat a subject into the ground but.....The 50 inch minimum for tigers...This goes for all 7 of the lakes in this great state of Washington.The 7 lakes are as follow:Evergreen Reservoir,Mayfield,Merwin Reservoir, Silver (spokane),Newman and Lake Tapps.
I've been reading alot..alot of the fishing reports. Some folks do not know that the rule has changed but it has..It is a revision of the 36 inch limit that no longer exists..the rule is in the regulations and folks needs read,acknowledge and follow these new rules. I know the rule change is pretty drastic but it was done for good reasons.
So please ladies and gentleman, respect the rule change. And follow it. If a sportsman went out and started hunting Elk for instance, that person should read the rules that apply to this beast and would be expected to know the rules when hunting it. Same goes for the Tigers please, if you fish them do your homework.Check the regs, Know the regs and follow the regs...thanks
Thought I'd just randomly click on this thread Great reminder too Didn't they stock some in Green Lake in Seattle? I wish...but no Actually yes they did, I believe to eat the carp but they chose all the tasty trout! So they terminated the program.
|
|
Rank: Admiral
Joined: 10/22/2007
Posts: 2,022
Location: Puyallup
|
Thanks Kenster I've heard Green lake mentioned many times,but thought they were talking about Green Lake near Omak.. 
Fun with Dwight http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gLeI-V9h6EY&feature=relatedYou like muskie fishing? http://www.muskylink.com/ How about bass? http://bigbasslink.ning.com/
|
|
Rank: Commander
Joined: 4/30/2007
Posts: 352
Location: tacoma
|
The rule is for all lakes with Tigers in them. I only listed the 7 main ones that are still in the Musky Program and are currently being restocked..Green Lake was stocked a few years back. Like Kenster stated. But apparently not many left...or any. Though a lady did say she saw one by the main dock where they rent the water toys. But that was a while ago...I think that there still may be more than what over people think..the trout fishery is pretty good there..hmm. Just one guys opinion...other lakes that were stocked were Fazon,Red Rock..there are a few others but cant think of them off the top of my head..
|
|
|
Guest |