Members: 50    Total Reports: 18070    Articles: 286
Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Members | Log In | Register

Lead or Tungsten? Options
allfingsfishy
Posted: Monday, October 06, 2008 2:47:57 AM
Rank: Angler

Joined: 10/6/2008
Posts: 2
Hi Everyone,
I’m really new to bass fishing and was wondering if any of you had an opinion on what worm sinkers are best to use, lead or tungsten?, and if tungsten, are they really worth the extra cost?
Fishing
Sponsor
Posted: Monday, October 06, 2008 2:47:57 AM
kzoo
Posted: Monday, October 06, 2008 5:52:51 AM

Rank: Commander

Joined: 5/31/2007
Posts: 449
Location: Seattle
I use tungsten bullet weights and i used to use tungsten barrel weights for carolina rigs, only reason for the carolina rigs was that I was fishing some reservoirs with timber, needed something smaller.

Right now I use lead for my dropshots, tungsten for my bullet weights and brass for my caronlina rigs. I don't think I can afford tungsten for all three applications. It's not needed, but I would recommend it for bullet weights on texas rigs.
allfingsfishy
Posted: Monday, October 06, 2008 5:58:20 AM
Rank: Angler

Joined: 10/6/2008
Posts: 2
Thanks for that.

Do you think it just a myth that the smaller the weight the less visible it is to the fish, hence the use of tungsten compared to lead?

Really cannot get my head around the difference in price and why people pay it, i know its better for environment but they can cost $6.00 a pop!

Thanks anyway.
bpm3067
Posted: Monday, October 06, 2008 9:33:41 AM

Rank: Advanced Member

Joined: 5/26/2007
Posts: 31
Location: East Bremerton
I think the use of tungsten weights contributes more toward having that weight in a small, dense package that can punch through matted vegetation, as well as having a harder weight that makes more noise when it contacts rocks or glass beads. The visual thing is also a factor, but to a lesser degree than the other two benefits, at least in my opinion.
Brianh
Posted: Monday, October 06, 2008 10:04:51 AM

Rank: Advanced Member

Joined: 1/19/2008
Posts: 51
Location: Puyallup
It is really too bad that the costs are so high for the weights. When we started Density Tackle, that was our first product (tungsten weights, hence the name Density). But, the shipping for the weights is so expensive, that it was truely cost prohibitive. I still have contacts to get the product, but do not think the weights are that much better. In the Canadian Provincial Parks, it is illegal to use ANY lead for fishing. I have heard that they check your tackle box forr lead before they ask you for your fishing license......(not sure if there is any truth to that though).

Brianh
Panic Minnows
"Rain or Shine, I'm going fishin"
islandbass
Posted: Monday, October 06, 2008 1:38:53 PM

Rank: Warrant Officer

Joined: 8/3/2007
Posts: 194
Location: Fed Way
I realize the benefits of W, but I cannot justify the cost for my economic situation. When I fish Lake Union, I can lost as many as 10 sinkers in an hour's time. If I were using W, I'd go broke too fast.

I'm with BPM 3067.

Basstradamus
Posted: Monday, October 06, 2008 5:03:15 PM

Rank: Warrant Officer

Joined: 3/23/2008
Posts: 110
just like bpm said, but what do i know i dont use weighs or worms =)



Team Grippin' Lipps
clam man
Posted: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 9:49:43 AM

Rank: Advanced Member

Joined: 4/28/2007
Posts: 75
Location: washington
I use tungsten. It is more expensive, but it is also more accurate in measurement. For example, a 1/8 oz lead weight from three different manufacturers is probably going to be different for each. Not so much with the more expensive metal.

Also, and don't be surprised that lead will probably be outlawed here in this state. It has already been done in many others because it really is a nasty thing to put into a lake.

Also...it fishes better, it is heavier per volume (so smaller size lure).

If you are losing 10 weights a day maybe you should switch how you are fishing or use a different presentation...although I have to admit, I have had days like that out on Banks lake for Smallies, where my texas rig doesn't last too long, and the big ones will break off.

Clam Man


FISH BARBLESS!!!
3riversbasser
Posted: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 6:24:43 PM

Rank: Member

Joined: 6/29/2007
Posts: 20
Location: Kirkland
Tungsten! Here's why:
-Smaller Size
-More Sensitive
-If its more expensive it must be better right? cheers

After fishing alot in areas where it's crucial to have the ability to tell the difference in bottom composition, i would say 100% tungsten is needed, but for the weekend warrior, or if your losing alot of gear, go cheap. Just my two cents.

Team Three Rivers Marine
Wired Energy Drinks
Trent Hale
Posted: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 11:06:55 PM

Rank: Lieutenant

Joined: 2/29/2008
Posts: 221
Location: PortOrchard,Wa.
Sick Don't think the fish care. I would look at the baits over the weights.Whistle I use both and cant tell much difference at all between the two other than priceGreedy . Now what bait to use should be more of a factor to think aboutThink .

Are you hung up again!


WA. HAWGS!!!
Users browsing this topic
Guest


Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Main Forum RSS : RSS

Digital Angler Theme Created by Aaron Borg (WashingtonLakes.com)
Powered by Yet Another Forum.net version 1.9.1.8 (NET v2.0) - 3/29/2008
Copyright © 2003-2008 Yet Another Forum.net. All rights reserved.

 
Copyright Michael Carey & Aaron Borg, 1997-2007
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Acceptable Use Policy | Contact Us